The newer generations of image AI models – e.g. Google’s “Nano Banana Pro” or OpenAI’s new “ChatGPT Images” – have opened up use cases many people waited on for years. These tools can now do far more for us than just “produce nicer pictures”.
I view these models as powerful visual information compression machines, not just as simple image generators anymore. We’ll now look at what exactly changed, which use cases this allows and where limitations still matter – with plenty examples. (Spoiler: Expect exciting new ways of visual storytelling for your work or lifelong learning.)
In general, to make sense of step changes like this, we must think outside the box. If we only ask “How does model X do on benchmarks?” we get incremental innovations. For the bigger jumps, we must keep an eye on AI’s emergent capabilities and ask better questions: “What becomes possible now that [e.g.] visuals and text can be shaped so precisely?“
Table of Contents
What’s the Step Change in Image AI (Hint: Texts)
In short, these tools (esp. Google’ Nano Banana series) now offer higher precision, finer control and more reliable text placement. This combo makes them suitable for real work rather than one‑off experiments. Let’s look closer at these drivers.
A key improvement is that text inside images now works (i.e. finally accurate and legible). This opens the door to e.g. infographics, diagrams, “whiteboard‑style” explainers that older tools struggled with. The models now also keep better consistency – faces, objects, places, icons etc. – which matters for multi‑image outputs. Think of applications like ad photoshoots, interior design layouts, comic strips (more use cases later).
What also “changes the game” is how the AI’s generative and (visual) “reasoning” capabilities are interacting. Under the hood, image models and multimodal language models (like Gemini) now iterate together: The image model drafts, the language model critiques, an improved version follows. This loop produces better outputs and lets you literally talk the AI through the design process like a human collaborator.
Practical Use Cases You Can Try Today
Overall, these tools shine where they turn messy content into something you can understand and discuss swiftly – but let’s zoom in:
- Structuring Complex Topics Fast: Diagrams like process flows, mind maps or decision trees unearth the underlying logical essence of a topic instead of leaving it buried in clutter. Try a simple prompt like: “Turn this complicated manual into one clear slide I can walk my team through step-by-step.”
- Appealing Infographics for Everything: Turn endless documents / PDFs – aka a storyteller’s nightmare – into quick‑to‑grasp visuals with one click. Think annual reports, research papers, policy drafts etc. I can imagine using this one day to create visual summaries of all my articles. Would that help you?
- Data Visualization & Slide Creation: Data visuals now respect scale and proportions. Nano Banana Pro, for instance, is surprisingly good at creating charts with proper look and feel. We are also a step closer to the “corporate dream” of AI‑made PPT slides that people can actually use. But mind the caveats (s. below).
Example: Info Compression at Scale (My Fave Use Case)
By using these models as visual knowledge compression engines, we can turn anything into scannable stories. Even this whole blog. I ran a test today with this prompt (in Gemini): “Create a poster which visualizes the core themes from my blog. Ensure enough breathing room between the elements to prevent visual overwhelm.” (BTW, the second half of that prompt is also a didactic tip / best practice for effective design.)
The resulting infographic above, I think, works well as a visual shortcut to what “Upward Dynamism” is all about. WDYT? (This was of course a very basic prompt. With some more sophistication and my prompt template (which you can find here) you can generate more impressive infographics.)
Caveats & Why Design Needs Human Judgment
Quick word of caution: these outputs are still not “pixel‑perfect”. And this is where the risks sneak in… At around 80% quality most people still double‑check AI outputs. The obvious mistakes simply force a second look. But what I’m observing in practice now: Once results cross the “magic” 90%+ line, our behavior changes. Many just blindly accept outputs 1:1 – that’s risky in business, academia or other high‑stakes areas…
My example above is no exception: That poster about my blog themes still has some flaws (e.g. redundant bullets). But I would edit it quite heavily before using it seriously on my site. That draft is – as so often with AI – a solid starting point but still needs some iterative back and forth with me. So, let’s not get lazy and better stick to best practices of human-AI collaboration.
Another risk is a false sense of understanding. Slick visuals – just like polished prose – can make us feel we “got it” even when we don’t. Also, a polished chart can hide its rotten core much easier than a messy one. Thus, we need experts to challenge the stories and assumptions behind each graphic – especially for sensitive matters. (And we ourselves must learn to challenge our own underlying mental biases…)
Wrap‑up: Pictures Are Worth A Thousand Words…
Modern image AI now complements language models in helping us learn, communicate and collaborate on complex topics better and faster – if we keep our critical thinking on.
Your turn: Where can “fast visual summaries” help you most in your work, education or hobbies? Maybe a report no one reads that needs a visual overhaul or a topic you want to teach but never found the right format for… If you want more inspo for use cases of image generators (beyond data compression), check out this post.
If this sparked some ideas, I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments or get in touch. Feel free to share it with colleagues, educators or friends who will benefit from adding this storytelling tool to their kit.
Cheers,
John
What do you think?